Return to New York Architecture Info front page.
The Buildings : Desktop Wallpaper : Add My Photos : Discussion Forum : 
Search : Contact : © : Privacy
You are here: Home > Architecture > New York > Columbus Circle >  > Two Columbus Circle
Two Columbus Circle, 2 Columbus Circle, New York
Photograph © Wayne Lorentz/Artefaqs Corporation
This image is available for business licensing,
or purchase this photograph as a print or poster


Two Columbus Circle, 2 Columbus Circle, New York
Photograph © Wayne Lorentz/Artefaqs Corporation
This image is available for business licensing,
or purchase this photograph as a print or poster


Got more pictures?
Got better pictures?
Share your skyscraper and architecture photos

Two Columbus Circle

Formerly: New York City Cultural Affairs Department
Formerly: The New York Cultural Center
Formerly: Huntington Hartford Gallery of Modern Art
Designed by: Edward Durell Stone and Associates
Construction Start: 1964
Construction Completed: 1965
Type: Skyscraper
Stories: 10
Location: 2 Columbus Circle
Area: Columbus Circle
City: New York, New York

Advertisement
Page tools: 
E-mail this page How to cite this article Printer-friendly version AIM this page My Yahoo! del.icio.us Newsvine Furl Reddit blinklist Fark
50% 60% of our readers like Two Columbus Circle.
Your Rating:
     A strange looking building that resembles a piece of modern art, because it was designed to house art. Its design is a concave upright rectangle like a giant marble juice box with all the juice sucked out of it. Its edges are literally perforated with double rows of round holes arranged in squares of four. The perforations are of special note because they allow the art inside to be viewed, at least partially, in diffused natural light. At the top are a series of double volume arches, adding to the verticality of this building. The building is more than a place to house art, it is a modern design exhibit on its own.

But how much longer the building will keep this look is unknown. It's been a long time since the building's heyday. Just five years after it opened, the art museum closed and it was turned over to a New Jersey college. Later, the building became offices for city bureaucrats. A decade later even they moved out, leaving a very large, very pretty vacant space. Plans have been put together to re-open the building as a museum. But as part of the conversion into the Museum of Arts and Design, there are fears that the facade will be changed. This has preservationist groups up in arms who don't want this building's visual appeal changed. The central question is whether this building is of important historical value to the city and the art community, and as with any other art, there are always multiple interpretations.

1964 - The building opens.
1969 - The building is turned over to Fairleigh Dickinson University. It uses the building to house its New York Cultural Center.
1975 - The New York Cultural Center closes. 1980's - The building becomes a tourist information center, and home to the city's Cultural Affairs Department.
1998 - The building is abandoned.
2004 - The National Trust names this building one of the most endangered in the nation.

Did You Know?
> The building was originally named after Huntington Hartford, heir to the A&P supermarket fortune.

Related Web Sites:
Discuss the architecture of Two Columbus Circle and other buildings in New York.
Last 5 Comments Mary L. Santarcangelo - Thursday, March 20th, 2008 @ 12:42am • Rating: Four stars.

I give it 4 stars because once you see it, you never forget it. Also it is a delicate artifact amidst its burly assertive big brothers. Keep it for the whimsey.

Thomas Yanul - Saturday, February 23rd, 2008 @ 12:49pm • Rating: Five stars.

Although not a particular fan of Stone, I do think it should be preserved as particular type of architecture of the time. I visited with Huntington Hartford (about 66") and if nothing else should be saved in his memory.

T. Morgan - Thursday, August 16th, 2007 @ 3:18pm • Rating: One star.

I would first like to say I support saving quality architecture whether traditional, modern or whatever. While certainly modern and abstract this building has reached the phase where shear age seems to grant a sort of affection. This building is an architectural statement for statements sake alone and warrants no such affection. It carries little relation to the surroundings, site, or pedestrian. Age or isolationist design in this case does not justify any protection for a building that itself destroyed a venerable predecessor, the Grand Circle Hotel. What goes around...

WRR1 NYC - Thursday, August 4th, 2005 @ 5:28am • Rating: One star.

So 60's in my opinion is not to impressive it lacks style it looks more like a air ventilator for the city's tunnels if they preserve it they should use special lighting techniques to enhance the appearance.

Susan Moscareillo - Tuesday, February 15th, 2005 @ 8:06pm • Rating: Four stars.

An impressive piece of art/architecture. I wish it was in Baltimore!

Add your corrections, comments, memories, or thoughts about this building.
Your name:
E-mail address:
Your nation:
Rate this structure:
1 5
Your comments:
 
Messages without valid e-mail addresses, or containing profanity will be automatically discarded. You're wasting your time, not ours.